<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common SEO Mistakes: CSS Image Replacement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/</link>
	<description>Usability, Design and Front-Side Programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett Barros</title>
		<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Barros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 08:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latentmotion.com/?p=81#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Right you are (were), thanks for reminding me. I&#039;m now going to test having my individual pages be h1s, and look forward to seeing the results.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of the potential pitfalls is that the styling of the title is designed to be exactly the same as the headers on the home page, which are rightfully h2s (repeating h1&#039;s would be no good). What effect will identically styled header tags be? Certainly Google knows the font size and other computed styles, and given that the header was an h2 on a page with no h1s, it may make no difference what-so-ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ll let you know if I see anything interesting happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are (were), thanks for reminding me. I&#39;m now going to test having my individual pages be h1s, and look forward to seeing the results.</p>
<p>One of the potential pitfalls is that the styling of the title is designed to be exactly the same as the headers on the home page, which are rightfully h2s (repeating h1&#39;s would be no good). What effect will identically styled header tags be? Certainly Google knows the font size and other computed styles, and given that the header was an h2 on a page with no h1s, it may make no difference what-so-ever.</p>
<p>I&#39;ll let you know if I see anything interesting happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 19:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latentmotion.com/?p=81#comment-111</guid>
		<description>This page is missing  an h1...http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This page is missing  an h1&#8230;http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trust-not</title>
		<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>trust-not</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latentmotion.com/?p=81#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Ya. Be real careful where you use these techniques as maybe it&#039;s ok in a couple of static pages, but may be completely devastating when implemented in let&#039;s say: a few million dynamic pages... Consider the context, consider the text (as mentioned above), but most importantly you should consider the risk. Hate to first mention the G-word, but Google hasn&#039;t officially announced *any* real y/n as to whether this is a generally acceptable practice or not. In fact, Matt Cutts mentioned here &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-unwise-comments/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-unwi...&lt;/a&gt; that he does not recommend hiding text with CSS and quote: &quot;In turn, Google has the right to decide not to return that site in our search results, because we feel that hiding text that is not visible to users is deceptive.&quot; - Which is apparently what has happened in my case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya. Be real careful where you use these techniques as maybe it&#39;s ok in a couple of static pages, but may be completely devastating when implemented in let&#39;s say: a few million dynamic pages&#8230; Consider the context, consider the text (as mentioned above), but most importantly you should consider the risk. Hate to first mention the G-word, but Google hasn&#39;t officially announced *any* real y/n as to whether this is a generally acceptable practice or not. In fact, Matt Cutts mentioned here <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-unwise-comments/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-unwi.." rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/seo-mistakes-unwi..</a>. that he does not recommend hiding text with CSS and quote: &#8220;In turn, Google has the right to decide not to return that site in our search results, because we feel that hiding text that is not visible to users is deceptive.&#8221; &#8211; Which is apparently what has happened in my case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seoprofessional</title>
		<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>seoprofessional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 21:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latentmotion.com/?p=81#comment-102</guid>
		<description>thank you, excellent explanation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you, excellent explanation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seoprofessional</title>
		<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>seoprofessional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latentmotion.com/?p=81#comment-10</guid>
		<description>thank you, excellent explanation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you, excellent explanation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrewjhonson</title>
		<link>http://www.latentmotion.com/css-image-replacement-mistakes/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>andrewjhonson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latentmotion.com/?p=81#comment-9</guid>
		<description>This is indeed a great article. CSS always plays a vital role in web design and it always gives you opportunity to make your website Google friendly. I have compiled few factors &#039;why Google loves CSS&#039; that you can check at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/get-to-know-why-css-is-good-for-google/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/get-to-know-why-cs...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is indeed a great article. CSS always plays a vital role in web design and it always gives you opportunity to make your website Google friendly. I have compiled few factors &#39;why Google loves CSS&#39; that you can check at <a href="http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/get-to-know-why-css-is-good-for-google/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/get-to-know-why-cs.." rel="nofollow">http://www.bestpsdtohtml.com/get-to-know-why-cs..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
